Avoid Testing Empty Lines with Regex MULTILINE Flag without Checking String Emptiness
What is it?
This practice is triggered by the use of regular expressions with the MULTILINE
flag to detect empty lines without checking if the entire string is empty. The use of ^$
with the MULTILINE
flag does not match the string end for empty checks, which can lead to missing out empty lines at the end of inputs.
Why apply it?
Using regex with the MULTILINE
flag along with ^$
can lead to incorrect assumptions about empty lines since it fails to match empty strings at the end of input. By ensuring that we check if a string is completely empty, we can accurately detect empty lines.
How to fix it?
When searching for empty lines, combine the use of the ^$
pattern with a check for emptiness using isEmpty()
method of the string.
Examples
Example 1:
Negative
The negative example only uses the ^$
regex with the MULTILINE
flag without verifying if the entire input string is empty.
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
public class EmptyLineChecker {
static final Pattern p = Pattern.compile("^$", Pattern.MULTILINE); /* Noncompliant */
public boolean containsEmptyLines(String str) {
return p.matcher(str).find();
}
// Testing the method
public static void main(String[] args) {
EmptyLineChecker checker = new EmptyLineChecker();
System.out.println(checker.containsEmptyLines("line1\n\nline2")); // Correctly prints 'true'
System.out.println(checker.containsEmptyLines("")); // Incorrectly prints 'false'
}
}
Example 2:
Positive
The positive example correctly combines regex pattern matching for empty lines with a check that the input string itself may be empty.
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
public class EmptyLineChecker {
static final Pattern p = Pattern.compile("^$", Pattern.MULTILINE); /* Compliant */
public boolean containsEmptyLines(String str) {
return p.matcher(str).find() || str.isEmpty();
}
// Testing the method
public static void main(String[] args) {
EmptyLineChecker checker = new EmptyLineChecker();
System.out.println(checker.containsEmptyLines("line1\n\nline2")); // Prints 'true'
System.out.println(checker.containsEmptyLines("")); // Prints 'true'
}
}
Negative
The negative example misses checking if the string itself is empty, thus failing to identify scenarios where the entire input is empty.
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
public class ContentAnalyzer {
private static final Pattern emptyLinePattern = Pattern.compile("^$", Pattern.MULTILINE); /* Noncompliant */
public boolean hasEmptyLines(String content) {
return emptyLinePattern.matcher(content).find();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
ContentAnalyzer analyzer = new ContentAnalyzer();
System.out.println(analyzer.hasEmptyLines("text\n\nmore text")); // Correctly prints 'true'
System.out.println(analyzer.hasEmptyLines("")); // Incorrectly prints 'false'
System.out.println(analyzer.hasEmptyLines("\nonly line")); // Correctly prints 'true'
}
}
Example 3:
Positive
The positive example utilizes both the regex and a direct isEmpty()
check to correctly identify empty lines or if the string itself is empty.
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
public class ContentAnalyzer {
private static final Pattern emptyLinePattern = Pattern.compile("^$", Pattern.MULTILINE); /* Compliant */
public boolean hasEmptyLinesOrString(String content) {
return emptyLinePattern.matcher(content).find() || content.isEmpty();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
ContentAnalyzer analyzer = new ContentAnalyzer();
System.out.println(analyzer.hasEmptyLinesOrString("text\n\nmore text")); // Prints 'true'
System.out.println(analyzer.hasEmptyLinesOrString("")); // Prints 'true'
System.out.println(analyzer.hasEmptyLinesOrString("\nonly line")); // Prints 'true'
}
}